guys cock sizes in profiles

4 Jul 2010

Just curious do most guys have trouble measuring there cocks or is it just a guess or what they would like it to be , we are on a couple of Adult sites and in the profile says cock size , how many times we have met a guy that says cock is 7 to 8 inches as thats what she likes only to have the guy turn up and if its 5 inches its doing well Has anyone else noticed this aswell Melbcpl01

4 Jul 2010

jahahahahahahahaha you WILL always have people who over exaggerate best thing is to get them on cam so then u can see for yourself before you meet them if cock size if going to be important.

5 Jul 2010

Not only do they falsley advertise this male organ......but when it comes to the sharing and caring side of things if you know what I mean wink

:wink: they are hopeless......and it makes me understand why woman are seeking something new and exciting......in their profiles........... Then on the other hand......its all about fun......fun......fun.....who really cares about the size of their cock, or if they dont really understand those special places a woman likes to be touched, instead they rub or suck your nipples until they go numb...................lol............just another one of those moments.....that when you think about it later.......it brings a smile to your dial...... lol

:lol: Seriously though if size is an essential criteria , I would suggest a private cam meeting on the relevant adult sites, prior to meeting up........

5 Jul 2010

good advice on the cam viewing and that can work if they have a cam , cock size isnt all that important its whats done with it that counts but when you do look for a certain size just for the fun of it it would be nice if the guys could put the correct size on the profile 4-5 inches is not 7-8 inches guys need to put correct information down as when they get undressed you soon can tell if its the stated size We have seen the same thing looking at a pic before meeting and the angle the pic was taken made it look a lot bigger than it was in real life Maybe its just guys dont know how to measure themselves properly

11 Jul 2010

I agree with Zest & Melbcpl01, guys are useless, most exaggerate the size of their cock. The average Aussie male cock size is 6.5 inches. You measure it from your abdomen and not from your ball sack (as that adds the extra inch most guys assume they have) to the tip of the knob, pretty obvious one would have thought! Even better is to ask them the 'girth' of their cock and quite a few reach for a dictionary first. Which brings me to the matter of illiteracy within the male population on any given sex site. Some of the spelling is atrocious (and this site has a spell check mechanism) let alone the actual grammer many guys use, real cave man *GRUNT* type language. Just thought I'd drop my two bobs worth in the pot. Zippz.

11 Jul 2010

hahahah... Penis size. Ya wont win, its so wrapped up in a male's self esteem... Ego and length are so intertwined, its impossible for it to be a straightforward answer. Who would of thought it would be so difficult? Get them on cam, different angles, holding it in their hand - should give you a semi-clear indication.

17 Aug 2010

Bone pressed erect length - from the pubic bone - is my favorite esteem booster. I guess that in the world of advertising, exaggerating a little does not harm your chances of success. Let's face it, "guy with tiny cock wants to pleasure ladies" probably isn't brilliant advertising. Anyway, length and girth varies according to how close to cumming you are. For the record, Conservative length - 5.5" girth 4.7". "Bone-pressed get another inch (6.5"). I'm gonna be brave and classify myself as 'small' because I know I am a bit smaller and thinner than most white guys, but have a handy up-tilt which is pretty effective as long as I stay fit and use good technique. ....Lies, damn lies and statistics

18 Aug 2010

thank god ive been they stated they had one guy turn up said he has a 9 but blow me over he is a 10inch and i met him on here an three visits later we still see each other.

24 Aug 2010

They measure it from their ARSEHOLE'S A good easy fix if you meet up with them when they drop their pants and they have lied just say sorry you lied and show them the door

3 Sep 2010

The largest sexual organ in the body is above the shoulders. My husband has a small penis but uses it (and everything else) perfectly, and sites like this only help to keep things interesting. In my opinion, guys that overstate their virtues probably think it's the only thing that counts, and in that respect, they miss the mark.

17 Sep 2010

Quote by zippz
I agree with Zest & Melbcpl01, guys are useless, most exaggerate the size of their cock. The average Aussie male cock size is 6.5 inches. You measure it from your abdomen and not from your ball sack (as that adds the extra inch most guys assume they have) to the tip of the knob, pretty obvious one would have thought!
Even better is to ask them the 'girth' of their cock and quite a few reach for a dictionary first.
Which brings me to the matter of illiteracy within the male population on any given sex site. Some of the spelling is atrocious (and this site has a spell check mechanism) let alone the actual grammer many guys use, real cave man *GRUNT* type language.
Just thought I'd drop my two bobs worth in the pot.
Zippz.

lol i agree with girth mine has a 6.2" girth and mesures 2.2 inches wide what do you think the length is.
Im in the club where girls go "I have done anal before but there is no way im doing it with you that would hurt!"

17 Sep 2010

lol i agree with girth mine has a 6.2" girth and mesures 2.2 inches wide what do you think the length is. Im in the club where girls go I have done anal before but there is no way im doing it with you ! that would hurt ! So at the end of the day isnt it how you treat your partner that counts, Gentle, soft, passionate, firm thrusting and angled. I have always said the hands are overlooked as are other parts of the body when caressing.

17 Sep 2010

Why not answer your question in a practical test: Just go at woolworths to the lady on the checkout and ask her where they keep the extra large condoms? Her eyes will answer your question.

17 Sep 2010

I for one think that 5 inches is perfectly adeqate.

17 Sep 2010

Yes agreed there is nothing wrong with 5" but when you want to try something bigger just for the fun of it and you respond to someone that fits what your looking for at the time , you expect to get that not have someone that says has 8" or 9" then only get 5" its a bit of a let down Maybe its guys just don't know the correct way of measuring thier cocks or thats what size they wish they we're Melbcpl01

17 Sep 2010

6 inches is about this size isnt it? ---> <---

18 Sep 2010

Any one for 12 inches?

18 Sep 2010

Quote by walwal
Any one for 12 inches?

12" geez pitty its Richmond NSW and not Vic
Melbcpl01

18 Sep 2010

Sorry, missing decimal point, should have been 1.2 inches.

28 Sep 2010

.

28 Sep 2010

.

30 Sep 2010

Quote by bang_in_yeppoon
They measure it from their ARSEHOLE'S

how did you know i measured it from my ex wife!!

16 Oct 2010

Its the internet, people exaggerate. Theres an awesome break down of internet dating lies here: (it is ok to post relevant links right?)

17 Oct 2010

Quote by zippz
I agree with Zest & Melbcpl01, guys are useless, most exaggerate the size of their cock. The average Aussie male cock size is 6.5 inches. You measure it from your abdomen and not from your ball sack (as that adds the extra inch most guys assume they have) to the tip of the knob, pretty obvious one would have thought!
Even better is to ask them the 'girth' of their cock and quite a few reach for a dictionary first.
Which brings me to the matter of illiteracy within the male population on any given sex site. Some of the spelling is atrocious (and this site has a spell check mechanism) let alone the actual grammer many guys use, real cave man *GRUNT* type language.
Just thought I'd drop my two bobs worth in the pot.
Zippz.

Grammar, not grammer. Imagine being corrected by a dumb male.

20 Oct 2010

Well done Alby, your the only one who actually checked to see if I was throwing in any inaccuracies!

Quote by Alby_46
I agree with Zest & Melbcpl01, guys are useless, most exaggerate the size of their cock. The average Aussie male cock size is 6.5 inches. You measure it from your abdomen and not from your ball sack (as that adds the extra inch most guys assume they have) to the tip of the knob, pretty obvious one would have thought!
Even better is to ask them the 'girth' of their cock and quite a few reach for a dictionary first.
Which brings me to the matter of illiteracy within the male population on any given sex site. Some of the spelling is atrocious (and this site has a spell check mechanism) let alone the actual grammar many guys use, real cave man *GRUNT* type language.
Just thought I'd drop my two bobs worth in the pot.
Zippz.

Grammar, not grammer. Imagine being corrected by a dumb male.

23 Oct 2010

Quote by zippz
I agree with Zest & Melbcpl01, guys are useless, most exaggerate the size of their cock. The average Aussie male cock size is 6.5 inches. You measure it from your abdomen and not from your ball sack (as that adds the extra inch most guys assume they have) to the tip of the knob, pretty obvious one would have thought!

Er... I'm not quite sure how measuring from the ball sack would add any length. Unless you mean they measure from the bottom of it.
Perhaps a ' How To Measure Your Penis' tutorial is in order.
Would this be the right position for the tape measure?
http://www.swingersheaven.com.au/members/my-photo.html?id=28609

Just thought I'd drop my two bobs worth in the pot.

I only have one Bob's worth, but I'm happy to drop it 'in the pot'. :twisted:

24 Oct 2010

i openly admit my variance from under 7" up to 9". Im the nervous type at times but i wont advertise what i cant deliver as its a set up to disappoint. I figure if i expect her to be honest i have to be too. i say be proud of what you have and take the pressure off yaselves men. If she's expecting 5 then she'll enjoy 5. If shes expecting 8 and you give her 5 your on the back foot...

27 Oct 2010

Zippz: your? You mean you're, right?!

28 Oct 2010

Quote by Hotsydneymale
Zippz: your? You mean you're, right?!

Are you talking about this part hot? :arrow: "You measure it from your abdomen..."
Can't see where else Zippz uses the words 'your' or even 'you're'.
Sorry, but this is the correct usage of the word 'your'; meaning 'that which belongs to you'; in this case, your abdomen. 'You're', on the other hand, is the abbreviation of the expression 'you are'; as in: 'You're wrong and Zippz is right'. Sorry but you're letting us guy's down, when you correct what is supposed to be a spelling/English usage error, to spite a criticism that some guys fail to use valid English grammar and spell poorly, but then as it happens, the alleged 'error' turns out to have been correct in the first place and your correction is actually incorrect. :huh: If you are going to counter a criticism with an implicit assertion of hypocrisy, I might suggest that you're going a long way out on a limb, and so you need to make sure you have your fact's (or in this case, your arbitrary communication conventions) very straight for the record. The hypocrisy is inevitably redoubled if you turn the issue into a smug, pedantic, bone of contention, but then confirm the original criticism in the effort to play 'tit for tat'. ... Egg-face much? :sticky: :doh:
BTW. However fastidious a person may generally be in their spelling and grammar skills, the moment they make this issue a matter of critical review, they invariably open them selves up to a barrage of potential criticism, for every trivial misgiving, or minor transgression of their own literacy, language usage, grammar and spelling. It's inevitable isn't it? You can criticize just about ANYTHING, that is subject to opinion or evidence in the real world (providing we don't have instant access to it), but spelling and grammar, are the basic tools you use, to represent yourself in a text based, online discussion forum such as this. So if you hazard the temptation to vilify a particular person or group, for their lack of English skills, spelling, grammar or generals literacy, it stands to reason you will be scrutinized and nit picked all the way to hell, because your own writing skills are on full display. It's a cheap shot really, to take an otherwise valid criticism and attempt to nullify it by pleading hypocrisy, in the very rare case that the critic might succumb by some minuscule degree, to the very fault they have scorned. Everybody makes minor spelling and language errors from time to time. Mostly we don't notice these errors, because the errors we make are our own and by definition, they hover below our own radar. If we could notice them on a brief proof reading, it's fare to suppose, we would correct them.
It is natural to assume (for each of us) that our own literacy is quite adequate and what we are 'thinking' is represented well, by the words we write. We only write, at any given time, what seems to us, the best expression of the thoughts we wish to convey. It may take some people more effort than others, but generally, what we express, is the closest representation of the thoughts we wish to convey, within the bounds of our individual literary capacity. When somebody doesn't understand something I have written (or even said), I might not be able for the life of me, to see how they fail to comprehend, what for me is an unambiguous and concise discourse. I can't see the imperfections, which may compromise the gap between my intended idea and my tentative efforts to convey some understanding of it. So any person tempted to criticize the literacy skills of others, is just as unlikely not notice their own errors. Moreover English is a horrid language with the most ridiculous of arbitrary rules; the only consistent one being that every rule in English, must have some arbitrary exceptions (except any rules made after three o'clock on Wednesday afternoons, by people who are wearing green socks). It might be considered in some quarters, just a tad superficial, to evaluate a person as a potential fuck buddy on their manifest literacy skills.
On the other hand, there are those who are far too lazy to even bother with a cursory proofreading, or to opposite click on those word with a pretty, red squiggly line beneath them and select a word from the context menu, that represents the correct spelling of the one they intended. There are those who's atrocious lack of literacy, is nothing less than a reflection on their whole attitude to life and their disregard of even the basic modicum of due diligence, required to express their basic needs, desires and what they have to offer for anybody who might respond to their messages/ads/profile. Zippz has a fair point in this regard and even one or two spelling errors will do nothing to undermine the point being made. There are some who won't even be bothered to make the minimal effort, to satisfy the basic requisites, of a fair partner/playmate on this website. Atrocious literacy skills, or failure to proof read and spell check, are likely to be significant indicators of one or more of the following: apathy, ineptitude, arrogance, laziness, slovenliness, antisocial inclinations, maturity issues and/or inconsiderateness. Any and all of which I consider, is likely to have a somewhat negative impact upon sex.
And please; the point stands, regardless of whether I may have made the odd spelling mistake or minor grammatical transgression. Please don't bother to pick on my literacy skills. If you disagree with any of the points I have made, then by all means, address those instead. ;)
Regards Bob.

30 Oct 2010

Hey, Bob.

Well done Alby, your the only one who actually checked to see if I was throwing in any inaccuracies!

I think this is the incorrect 'your' that was being referenced.