mmmmm. cant say that i ouldnt mind being on the receiving end of that.
jeannie and major nelson would be fun. and zsa zsa gabor about the time she was on green acres. she has some of the cutest nighties ive ever seen
definately closed for me. i just like to concentrate on the feeling of whats inside me and the way it makes me hotter and hotter
while shellie lasciviously
I have a thing for wedding dresses. and dogging and being gangbanged.
So...... Im thinking just how much fun it would be to combine all 3. Whats more, im also not that far from a church that has a rather private area behind it that would make a great venue for it. And doing this is kinda on my bucket list and Im pretty keen to tick it off. There aint too many fantasies left on it unfortunately but this is a definate to do.
So Im looking for 3 to 5 boys who'd like to meet up with me on a sat or sunday nite after 9 to participate. But you have to play the part too. Id expect that youd turn up well enuff dressed to go to a wedding. A tux or dinner suit would be nice, after all, Ill be in a wedding dress, hooped petticoat, veil and the appropriate lingerie ( corset, stockings and garters and so on), so I expect that youll play the part.
Theres a shot of me in a wedding dress ( one of them) on my profile if you want some idea of what Ill be looking like on the nite. Im sure itll be a fun time for all. But make sure you read my profile...... dont want any surprises!
So email me if your seriously into taking part in it. and make sure that you have a foto. Once ive found the rite bunch of boys ( and if youd like to bring your partner, thats OK too) Ill send an email to you with the details 2 weeks before the big occasion with the rest of the details. It will be in Elesternwick Melbourne.
well.... if you wanna pay for a little bit of surgery, Id be more than hapy to be your on call toy on the side
Holy crap batman. Theyll be tellin us to wear our undies under our pants soon.
I work for a telco that sells..... INTERNET lines of one sort or another. I also used to deal with complaints in that we (Telco) had polluted their perfect little johnnys mind with picture of naked people performing all sorts of perverted acts against the laws of god.
We dont sell this stuff to people under 18 as they are MINORS and hence incapable of making a contract in the eyes of the law as they havent matured enough to deal with the ramifications whether it be the cost or if its good for them or not.
Thats why thier PARENTs have to sign up for it. And then pass the internet accessing device on to little sweet and perfect johnny ( who'd never knowingly look at something "like that") has decreed that it is no longer the responsibility of parents who have signed up with telecommunication providers to provide their sweet little offspring with "educational content" to ensure that their sweet little johnny doesnt go and download a bucket load of inappropriate content while doing his homework, it is up to him (KRUDD) and us.
What a F$%^&*& larf.
Whatever happened to "parental responsibility" .
In the eyes of the law as it stands, it is illegal to provide a minor with the means to obtain sexually explicit material or whatever. The onus is on the parent / guardian who signs the contract for the internet supply and then gives it to little johnny on a laptop or mobile phone to go and play with without any supervision. To me , I see it as an adult giving a minor access to porn. And in the eyes of the law , this IS illegal. Remember. the telco sold the access to an adult, the adult gave the access to a minor. Simple.
And you wouldnt belive how many stupid people can't see that watching their kids on the internet is as important as watching them at the park when they play or if they go into a public toilet or whatever. Ive spent hours arguing this very point with them when they complain about what they found on little johnnys hard disk and try to sue us for it.
What we really need ( rather than an internet filter slowing down every business transaction, communication and removing the chance for australia to compete successfully in business on the world stage) is a department of parental responsibility. In my experience, the parents dont do what theyre supposed to, so and the Telcos shouldnt t be held responsible. The parents need to be ( or whoever provided the device to little johnny)
Instead of using us (telco provider) as the scapegoat, he should get to the heart of the problem and create the dept. of Parental Indifference.
This way, the idiot who provided the minor with the unfettered access to the internet can be reported and dealt with in the eyes of the law appropriately. And as far as the revolting trade in kiddy porn ( which this argument has nothing to do with) theres already a very effective solution that regularly returns results with out screwing people and business over with a filter.
But wont do this ( the schoolteachers that make up the vast majority of his staff get that it wont get them voted back in) so he fucks us all over with censorship ( he should have been a schoolteacher too). I always thought the labor gov was about making life easier for the average joe and that parents have the requirement to take responsibility for what their kids are exposed to ( ie. put the internet access somewhere that the all knowing mum and dad can see what little johnny is accessing or bar their mobiles from internet access). Im pretty sure that all business would have the same view. And these are the key to the prosperity that has provided daddy with the $$$ that gave little johnny the internet accessing device in the first place. .
I vote for mum and Dad doing their job rather than expecting a nanny state to take care of their responsibility . Or are we going to turn into america and have to label oranges and vegimite jars with the advice that "inserting this object anally is possibly going to require medical attention"
AArgh
Dear Mr Please find a useful cause for the wowsers to turn their attention to. I would recommend the after dark violence on our streets as a good start ( but that may be hard. it still gets back to the values that parents instill in their kids and wont make you the bloke with the easy and voteable solution).
But Im pretty sure that wont fit in with 'being seen as a leader on the world stage" and hence may be aginst your "core valiues"
Maybe Julia mite get it rite. Its not that bad she runs the place while you go cavorting round the world dealing with the world issues whilst the country you provide a figurehead to needs some real ( non easy vote getting )direction.
Same to you mr abbot. But you look nice in bike shorts
.
well...
Ive been there a few times. Its fun, but then again i prefer men.
And do you mean transvestites or transexuals? Transvestites are usually pretty happy to let you blow them and will fix you rite up if you wanna bend over, but us transexual types are usually pretty sensitive about "the bits" and usually dont appreciate being asked to get them out. After all, gals dont have doodles.
Guess it all depends on what youre after
being trans I was more than a little self concious the first couple of times i went to a swingers club. But generally speaking, Im pretty well accepted there. No one seems to mind me at all, even the gals. Its really not about what you look like, its about how you get on with the others. And as long as youre yourself, youll have no problems.
Ill be at landcox park in Eleternwick at 10 tonite (28/02). Hoping to meet someone with a huge cock, a hot load and no time for chatting.
Just look for me near the playground